Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
acquittal at the end of all the evidence
English answer:
found (determined) to be not guilty after all the evidence is presented
Added to glossary by
Michael Powers (PhD)
Feb 28, 2009 22:20
15 yrs ago
3 viewers *
English term
acquittal at the end of all the evidence
English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
acquittal because there are no more evidence?
Change log
Mar 5, 2009 04:14: Michael Powers (PhD) Created KOG entry
Responses
+2
2 mins
Selected
found (determined) to be not guilty after all the evidence is presented
acquital is when the defendant is determined to be "not guilty" instead of "guilty
"innocence" never has to be proven -
Mike :)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2009-02-28 22:31:39 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
What I explained is relevant for the law in the US
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 42 mins (2009-02-28 23:03:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Exactly. In the US, at least, when a defendant has a criminal trial, whether it is a bench trial (judge only) or with a jury, the verdict or decision is either guilty, not guilty, or a hung jury (undecided). As Gary correctly pointed out, when found not guilty, or acquitted, the defendant cannot be charged for the same crime except under exceptional circumstances, such as jury tampering (jury manipulation through threats, bribes, etc.).
In this case "acquittal" means "not guilty".
In the system in thie US, since your are presumed innocent, the jury does not find you innocent, but rather guilty or not guilty, assuming it reaches a decision.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 days (2009-03-05 04:14:57 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
My pleasure, Yelena - Mike :)
"innocence" never has to be proven -
Mike :)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2009-02-28 22:31:39 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
What I explained is relevant for the law in the US
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 42 mins (2009-02-28 23:03:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Exactly. In the US, at least, when a defendant has a criminal trial, whether it is a bench trial (judge only) or with a jury, the verdict or decision is either guilty, not guilty, or a hung jury (undecided). As Gary correctly pointed out, when found not guilty, or acquitted, the defendant cannot be charged for the same crime except under exceptional circumstances, such as jury tampering (jury manipulation through threats, bribes, etc.).
In this case "acquittal" means "not guilty".
In the system in thie US, since your are presumed innocent, the jury does not find you innocent, but rather guilty or not guilty, assuming it reaches a decision.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 days (2009-03-05 04:14:57 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
My pleasure, Yelena - Mike :)
Note from asker:
So this is acquital for the reason that the person is not guilty? |
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Dr Lofthouse
: Don't think you can state this - UK/Scotland or USA Law?
5 mins
|
I am referring to US Law
|
|
agree |
Gary D
: acquittal means not guilty, aquitted of the offence = found not guilty
24 mins
|
Thank you, Gary - Mike :)
|
|
agree |
Demi Ebrite
2 days 2 hrs
|
Thank you, Demi - Mike :)
|
|
agree |
conejo
3 days 6 hrs
|
Thank you, conejo - Mike :)
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you, Michael!"
Reference comments
11 mins
Reference:
Acquital - differences in USA and English/Scottish Law
Profoundly important to know the jurisdiction of the translation - particularly if it is referring to an actual verdict or court transcript
Reference:
Peer comments on this reference comment:
agree |
Michael Powers (PhD)
: I agree that this is very important, since the laws different from one place to another.
1 min
|
agree |
Phong Le
1 day 5 hrs
|
Discussion
Michael's answer is still correct.